Gary Paul Brown Private Prosecution Imminent!

[Bus Stop]

Gary Paul Brown self-employed Bailiff with DCBL (Debt Collections Ltd) Facing criminal charges of Perverting the Course of Justice, Fraud, and?
Gary Brown is editing or paying someone to edit the video evidence to the criminal & civil courts to which can be proven by way of experts. This has No bearing on Bailiff Law. Brown is a criminal in Drag.
I can’t understand why you allow this bent corrupt so-called Enforcement Agent access to this site to make a mockery of the bailiff industry! viewtopic.php?t=5050 He’s a convicted Counterfeiter forger fraudster!!
https://www.fact-uk.org.uk/mod-police-i ... -property/
This site must have been set up to protect innocent people from scumbags such as (Brown) then why do you allow him access on the site to dictate to you? It makes a mockery of all the many victims who have made complaints regarding Brown on this site then comes on here bragging that he has done nothing wrong and that all the Judges back what he says and does. It’s barbaric!! He thinks he’s above the law! I hope this will give him something to read about over his Sunday morning breakfast. If Brown is not faking editing the videos to the courts then he has nothing to worry about but I wouldn’t want to be in his shoes. Just turn up at court and follow the justice procedure!! There’s a cell with your name on the door mate!
(Brown) is nothing more than a common thief.
Take a look at the video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxrDhrFWF_0
This is a bent piece of scum at work, and the Police are allowing him to do so because there RACIST! It’s disgusting! This sort of thing should be outlawed since the Stephen Laurence case. Do you hear the officer say you must be known to us? That’s discrimination, Pity the Police don’t know the law he has every right to refuse entry!
One thing you may all be able to help with, has this Gary Brown ever received a good kick-in? Which would have left his face swollen and with a black-eye??
(Brown) a personal message to you. If you think this is slander or defamation of your character then leave an email address and I will get our personal details to you and await proceedings. It will give me great pleasure to use the companies’ legal team to prove you are Bent & Corrupt. I won’t be getting into a slanging match with this (Brown) character as some of you do! But I will post the Date, Time, and Place of his first hearing.
I would love to hear from the many victims who have been a victim of this Corrupt Agent it could be a way of seeking justice without the video evidence. Talking to some of the victims that have been violated in their own homes by this scumbag and yet they didn’t even owe the monies.

If Brown makes any threats relating to this posting, you have my email address please ask your legal team to email me and I will disclose all the relevant information from experts verify and justifying this post.....

[zeke]

I've been doing a lot of fee reclaims with his name on it. This morning alone, a claim was filed for £14k plus costs.


The police do know the law but they put bailiffs in a class above the law. A case from last year surfaced after a police officer refused to arrest a bailiff for committing fraud by false representation, found himself being privately prosecuted by a debtors father, a solicitor and the bailiff was promptly arrested. But I have a feeling it will be a lacklustre prosecution effort. I don't know if the solicitor is still pursuing the police officer.

This site was set up to give people free inpartial help with bailiff matters - something not available on the internet.

Does anyone want to volunteer a freedom of information act on a selection of police forces requesting the training programme for police officers attending the scene of bailiffs executing a warrant or writ of control? I can provide the wording of the request.

[BODY-CAM]

I've got one of these bent videos!! Add mine to the list!!

[Syd Snitkin]

I like it when Gaz posts. It's like the olden days, laughing at the nutters in the asylum. We let him post so others can see what a weasel he is.

[Bus Stop]

https://plentyfishy.wordpress.com/brownleg/
Thank-you who ever posted this on the net.
There is a god up there!!!

[Poker man]

I've been doing a lot of fee reclaims with his name on it. This morning alone, a claim was filed for £14k plus costs.

You’ve been trying to take me down for 3 years. You’ve managed to get one case to court, which turned out to be a disaster for your client and will prove to be even worse for them in the near future. These ‘claims’ don’t worry me because I know I’ve done nothing wrong. You encourage people to make vexatious complaints and claim that I’ve stolen their belongings. I mean really??? Your desperation does bring a smile to my face. Stop wasting your time and come to me when you have something concrete, which will be NEVER!!!

[zeke]

I dont bring claims or complaints against bailiffs. I just stay the writ and set aside or vary the judgments. It doesn't matter which bailiff took the money. That is someone else's problem.

Its nothing about "taking you down". I do a service for my clients and if they tell me to stop the enforcement, then that is all I do.

[Syd Snitkin]

Still front loading the fees Gaz? First, second and sale stage for knocking on a door?

The reason they don't get to court is because your employers tidy up for you. We all know it - now get back to playing policeman from your dressing up box. Can't play soldier any more can you? Why is that?

[Sugar Babe]

Thank-you for this site and bringing Rogue Balilffs to the attention of the public! Viewing the video in this post I would like to confirm that I was visited by this thug. He came to my property shouting through the letter box. I went to the door and he shoulder barged the door open. I fell to the ground. My son who was 3 at the time witnessed mummy having here house broken into.

[Syd Snitkin]

Oh dear Gaz..... they can't all be wrong can they? Wonder if you'll have the guts to reply? And I don't mean the physical guts hanging over your belt you old chubbalubbs.

[zeke]

Do a GDPR for the bodycam footage. You can sue if it is not forthcoming.

https://www.nationalbailiffadvice.uk/Bo ... liffs.html

[Sugar Babe]

In response to Shedule 12
I don't think doing a GPDR because I don't think the camera was working there was no light flashing from it.

[BODY-CAM]

Message to Sugar Babe
Sorry to hear about your harrowing experience! When you say there was no light flashing from the camera would you be able to discribe it to me?
Personally message me with your findings and give me an email so I can respond personally. Thank - you

[zeke]

A flashing light is not needed. The bailiff only needs to be seen with a camera.

[Sugar Babe]

Was looking to send you a personal message but could not work it out.
The camera was oblong (silver) and held in place with a black harness.
He treated me with uter contempt and I did not feel safe in my own home. When I said I would call the Police he's response was "they ain't going to help you" what makes this sickening that on a £980 debt he wanted £3500. Why?? My father paid it.

[zeke]

You can have a detailed assessment.

https://www.nationalbailiffadvice.uk/Di ... Court.html

The court will examine the fees. Make it clear your father paid under the pain of having his goods removed and you have had to pay him back.

Otherwise the court will say you cannot bring a claim because you have "suffered no loss" because your father paid, or the court will say your father paid "voluntarily".

[Michelle]

A flashing light is not needed. The bailiff only needs to be seen with a camera.

I think he means he assumes the cam was not switched on because there was no LED light. But isn't there a requirement for bailiffs to have their cams switched on and recording when they attend? Otherwise what would be the point of them?

[zeke]

If a bailiff is seen with a camera and the proceedings, is put on strict proof of a fact which the camera would prove, then the bailiff's defence is usually defeated, or the claimant can appeal on one count error of fact.

This happens when proving that damage to goods and vehicles are pre-existing because the camera would show the damage was not there, and the claimant's case against the bailiff that the damage was caused while controlled goods, stand.

That is why bailiffs should never switch off their camera while on site.

[Bus Stop]

In response to Poker Man: You said come back when we had something concrete! Well what we
Have I can lay foundations and build a 92,000 feet apartment block the evidence is over whelming your editing the videos to the courts you bent peace of gutter trash. You want to be famous see you in court!

[BODY-CAM]

Something Concrete Poker Man!
How about Demanding monies with menaces! (Blackmail) https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1968/60/section/21 As per the bent video you supplied.
Or how about the bent video you supplied which shows you with a camera that WAS NOT the camera that shot the bloody thing as verified by the camera company. Eat shit and die!
I'm in the driving seat now and I'm enjoying every minute of it!!!!!!

[zeke]

Do you have a copy of the doctored video footage. I have found someone that can identify the software used to edit video from a sample.

[BODY-CAM]

Yes!
But it wont help you as it has been put together very expertly. I have sent it to forensic experts who have all come back with the same results. All criminal's cock up and Gary Brown or its creator cocked up! Police not interested so my solicitor said take it to your MP. The writ was obtained by FRAUD section 3 of the fraud act 2006
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/35/section/3

They are using a government minister to obtain a writ that's out of time make a complaint! So with a synopses drawn up by my solicitor highlighting all the criminal acts seen on the video along with the forensic reports I had a meeting with our MP.
His advise was get your solicitor to contact me and list everything down I will pass it to the correct authorities for a full investigation. He then went onto say "We have a rouge bailiff we need to get shot of the bastard"
Now we are all singing from the same hymn sheet and its only a matter of time.

Should this fail then I will join the class action group who are issuing a private prosecution.

[Syd Snitkin]

That rouge bailiff has made an appearance again.

[Amy]

I was just thinking those rouge bailiffs get everywhere.

[BODY-CAM]

I wonder how many complaints the Sun News Paper received regarding Gary Paul Brown having printed there article to get rid of Rouge Bailiffs.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/7822376/n ... -bailiffs/
Or is he the only one?????

[Amy]

The only rouge bailiff? I imagine he is, yes.

[zeke]

It's the MOJ press release from last week about having an independent regulator.

Previous governments ruled out a regulator on several grounds. The cost would be met by the bailiff industry which will demand an increased fee schedule putting further pressure on low income households, and the biggest loser would be the government, especially local councils, who benefits from over 90% of enforcement on the streets today.

[Sugar Babe]

I would like to wish you all a Happy New Year and to thank
my new found friends for there help and advise. I will make the complaint to Brighton County Court against you know who.

[Andy]

Happy new year from TheBailiffHelpForum. We hope you get the desired outcome you seek.

[Poker man]

In response to Poker Man: You said come back when we had something concrete! Well what we
Have I can lay foundations and build a 92,000 feet apartment block the evidence is over whelming your editing the videos to the courts you bent peace of gutter trash. You want to be famous see you in court!

I'm still waiting for this 'concrete' evidence you apparently have. Keep sending your abusive emails using the contact form on my website. I could disable the feature, but your terrible spelling and grammar (not to mention the wild accusations) keeps my entertained. They're the subject of many laughs amongst my colleagues and I. You're going to get an international arrest warrant issued for Claire Sandbrook? Because they issue these kinds of warrants at the will of anyone who asks for it don't they? I can see you're not the most intelligent of people, but you are certainly entertaining

[zeke]

I don’t know who is complaining, but the Claire Sandbrook and international arrest warrants rumour is just that, rumour - dating back from several years ago.

I understand Claire is back in the UK, so an international arrest warrant is pointless.

About 3 years ago, DCBL bodged an enforcement case against a garage business owned by a relative of a high-rank police officer, who investigated DCBL executing writs and enforcement in Claire’s name and questioned how she presides over that work while living in Florida.

I couldn’t give the client meaningful advice other than to stay the writ and recover damages from the creditor in the High Court, then give the client a media pack to see if anyone will pick up the story.

The client told me the police investigated and Claire gave misleading information on her Green Card application form lodged with the US Department of Home Security and they asked her to return to the UK where she is now.

Last year, a journalist contacted me investigating the relationship between Claire and DCBL with the latter carrying out enforcement work in her name and wanted to speak to Chris Badger and Sheila Harding who both used pseudonymous names on Marc Gander’s Consumer Action Group forums.

in 2017, I referred a client to a solicitor which culminated in a high court master questioning DCBL’s relationship with Claire saying it appears she delegated her power to DCBL and she is vicariously liable.

The question is whether Claire consented to DCBL using her name (and indemnity insurance). If Claire says no, then someone has a problem, but I doubt this is international arrest warrant territory.

[Paulnmusic]

I've been doing a lot of fee reclaims with his name on it. This morning alone, a claim was filed for £14k plus costs.

You’ve been trying to take me down for 3 years. You’ve managed to get one case to court, which turned out to be a disaster for your client and will prove to be even worse for them in the near future. These ‘claims’ don’t worry me because I know I’ve done nothing wrong. You encourage people to make vexatious complaints and claim that I’ve stolen their belongings. I mean really??? Your desperation does bring a smile to my face. Stop wasting your time and come to me when you have something concrete, which will be NEVER!!!

wrong